Home | Contact | Site Search



Why is Desal Important to Our Water Future?

  • To ensure we have adequate water during a drought

  • To restore groundwater levels and prevent seawater intrusion (For more info, click here.)

  • To make sure there's enough water for endangered fish  (For more info, click here.)

 

A message on behalf of Don Lane & Dan Kriege,
members of the scwd2 Task Force

Our community has a complex water supply problem. It includes the overdraft of freshwater aquifers, the likelihood of severe droughts brought about by global climate change, and the probability that regulators will reduce our water supply from surface streams to protect endangered fish species. We must continue to evaluate the threats and risks to our environment, our households and our local economy—and evaluate potential remedies to our water supply problems.

Critics question whether or not our community should build a desalination plant to meet our water needs. These critics typically identify a number of important issues we need to examine as desalination is considered … and then jump to the conclusion that desalination should be rejected before the evaluations are completed. Yet by arguing for rejection of desal they are essentially saying that we should “shelve” the project before allowing the community to consider the latest information and the potential for desalination to meet our water supply challenges.

The scwd2 Task Force, formed by the Santa Cruz City Council and the board of the Soquel Creek Water District, is working diligently to examine a variety of issues related to the proposed desalination plant, including energy usage; the cost to ratepayers; the impacts to the marine environment; the quality of desalinated water; and the overall question of whether or not desalination is the best approach. A full Environmental Impact Report is currently evaluating many of these issues, and this report, along with public comments, will assist the entire community in understanding them.

Opponents find it politically useful to claim that specific alternatives should be looked at before a full environmental review of desal is completed—ignoring the fact that elected representatives and citizens that volunteer on local commissions thoroughly examined and considered many alternatives. Those citizens sat through dozens of public meetings with countless hours of public testimony to decide that desalination was a reasonable and necessary approach to explore. No one we know believes desalination alone is a panacea for our water supply problems – rather it could serve as a safety net in our water supply portfolio. Our Integrated Water Plans identified desalination as part of a careful process of exploring new water sources while moving ahead with vigorous conservation measures and preparations for significant restrictions during drought periods.

We believe the community is better served if we stick with a thorough examination of all the facts and issues revealed though a rigorous environmental review process and then make an informed decision.

Respectfully,

Don Lane, Vice Mayor of Santa Cruz

Dan Kriege, Board Member, Soquel Creek Water District

Both serve as members of the scwd2 Task Force.